Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews

Now that your literature search is complete it is time to find full-text articles.

Instructions on finding full-text articles from Pratt Library and UC Libraries subscriptions are available in our Resource Discovery Guide.

Use the "Find Full-Text" feature if EndNote is used to manage results - instructions in our EndNote Guide.

If an article is not available through our Pratt or UC request them via our Article Request Form (see button below) or PubMed following the directions.  

Email prattlibrary@cchmc.org with any questions about finding full-text articles.

Appraisal tools should consider the reliability, importance and applicability of the clinical evidence found. According to the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine appraisal should consider these four questions:

  1. Does this study address a clearly focused question?
  2. Did the study use valid methods to address this question?
  3. Are the valid results of this study important?
  4. Are these valid, important results applicable to my patient of population?
    From: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools

There are many checklists available for free to assist with the appraisal of the evidence.

GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) is transparent way to evaluate the effectiveness of systematic reviews. Ratings range from high to very low and consider two types of studies; randomized controlled trials and observational studies.